ArticleCureus2026
Lateral Duodenal Diverticulitis Mimicking a Right Retroperitoneal Collection: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Giant duodenal diverticula are rare and often asymptomatic but may present with atypical clinical and imaging findings that resemble intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal collections, abscesses, or cystic neoplasms. We report the case of a 67-year-old male who presented with recurrent right-sided abdominal symptoms initially treated as pyelonephritis and subsequently diagnosed as a right retroperitoneal abscess. Further evaluation with multimodal imaging, including contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) with oral contrast and retrospective ultrasound review, revealed a giant duodenal diverticulum communicating with the second part of the duodenum. Accurate interpretation of these findings allowed revision of the diagnosis and prevented unnecessary percutaneous drainage, thereby avoiding potential iatrogenic complications. The patient was managed conservatively with intravenous antibiotics and demonstrated clinical improvement, with endoscopic evaluation planned for further assessment. This case highlights the value of careful multimodal imaging correlation in avoiding inappropriate invasive procedures and informing optimal patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.