Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41694963›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Regional Differences in Infrapatellar Fat Pad Stiffness With Changes in Knee Flexion Angle: A Quantitative Analysis Using Shear Wave Elastography.

Yoshinori Komatsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yoshinori KomatsuRehabilitation Science, Sendai Seiyo Gakuin College, Sendai, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate regional variations in infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP) stiffness at different knee flexion angles using shear wave elastography in healthy young adults and examined the effects of region and flexion angle. Methods Thirty-four healthy young adults participated in this study. IPFP stiffness was measured at four knee flexion angles (0°, 45°, 90°, and 135°) in four regions: subpatellar, central, lateral, and medial. Each condition was measured five times, and the mean value was used for analysis. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance was performed to assess the effects of knee flexion angle and measurement site. Results IPFP stiffness differed significantly by flexion angle (p = 0.010) and region (p = 0.03). A significant interaction between flexion angle and site was also found (p < 0.001). Post-hoc Bonferroni analysis showed no significant pairwise differences among simple main effects. Conclusion IPFP stiffness demonstrated angle- and region-dependent patterns in healthy young adults, with significant main effects of knee flexion angle and measurement region as well as their interaction. However, Bonferroni-adjusted post-hoc analyses did not reveal significant pairwise differences between specific conditions. These findings suggest that the IPFP is a structurally complex tissue whose mechanical behavior varies with knee position and interactions with surrounding patellofemoral structures and provide clinically relevant baseline information for physiotherapeutic assessment of knees presenting with anterior knee pain.

Indexed as

infrapatellar fat padknee flexion angleshear wave elastographytissue stiffnessultrasound echo

Identifiers

PMID41694963
PMCPMC12900626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.