ArticleCureus2026
Regional Differences in Infrapatellar Fat Pad Stiffness With Changes in Knee Flexion Angle: A Quantitative Analysis Using Shear Wave Elastography.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic Ultrasound of the Infrapatellar Fat Pad for Detecting Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Proof-of-Concept Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate regional variations in infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP) stiffness at different knee flexion angles using shear wave elastography in healthy young adults and examined the effects of region and flexion angle. Methods Thirty-four healthy young adults participated in this study. IPFP stiffness was measured at four knee flexion angles (0°, 45°, 90°, and 135°) in four regions: subpatellar, central, lateral, and medial. Each condition was measured five times, and the mean value was used for analysis. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance was performed to assess the effects of knee flexion angle and measurement site. Results IPFP stiffness differed significantly by flexion angle (p = 0.010) and region (p = 0.03). A significant interaction between flexion angle and site was also found (p < 0.001). Post-hoc Bonferroni analysis showed no significant pairwise differences among simple main effects. Conclusion IPFP stiffness demonstrated angle- and region-dependent patterns in healthy young adults, with significant main effects of knee flexion angle and measurement region as well as their interaction. However, Bonferroni-adjusted post-hoc analyses did not reveal significant pairwise differences between specific conditions. These findings suggest that the IPFP is a structurally complex tissue whose mechanical behavior varies with knee position and interactions with surrounding patellofemoral structures and provide clinically relevant baseline information for physiotherapeutic assessment of knees presenting with anterior knee pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.