ArticleCureus2026
Revisiting Risk: Uterine Rupture in a Low-Risk Gravida Without Prior Surgery.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uterine rupture typically occurs in women with prior uterine surgery, but spontaneous rupture in an unscarred uterus is rare. This report highlights such an event in a low-risk gravida following labor induction. This case report is about a 35-year-old gravida 2, para 1 woman at 40 weeks and two days of gestation with no history of uterine surgery underwent labor induction with a Cook balloon catheter and misoprostol. After 15 hours of labor, persistent late fetal heart rate decelerations prompted emergency cesarean delivery. Intraoperative findings revealed a 2-3 cm full-thickness rupture of the anterior uterine wall. Both mother and neonate had favorable outcomes. Spontaneous rupture can occur in unscarred, low-risk uteri. Vigilant fetal monitoring and clinical awareness during labor induction and augmentation are essential for timely diagnosis and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.