ArticleCureus2026
Thoracic Spinal Anesthesia With Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Conscious Sedation for Medical Thoracoscopy: A Comparative Pilot Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Medical thoracoscopy (MT) is associated with significant postoperative pain of varying intensity and duration, leading to significant morbidity. Our study compared the efficacy of thoracic spinal anesthesia (TSA) combined with erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with conscious sedation for MT using a patient-centered outcome measure. Methods This is a non-randomized prospective comparative pilot study wherein 36 patients undergoing MT were assigned alternately to receive TSA with ESPB or conscious sedation. Conscious sedation was administered with fentanyl and midazolam in graded doses with local instillation of lignocaine 2%. TSA was administered at the T6-T7 level with 25 mcg of fentanyl and 0.5% levobupivacaine (1.5 ml), followed by ESPB with 0.25% levobupivacaine (10 ml). The primary outcome was to compare the efficacy of ESPB with conscious sedation in terms of quality of recovery. The secondary outcome was to compare the time to administration of the first analgesic post procedure, total postoperative opioid consumption (mg) at 24 hours, and duration of the procedure. Intraoperative hemodynamic stability and block-related and post-procedure complications were also assessed. Results The total Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score was 112.83 ± 27.16 vs. 65.78 ± 22.13 (p = 0.0001), time to first analgesic was 11.69 ± 6.93 hours vs. 2.39 ± 1.69 hours (p = 0.0001), opioid consumption was 50 ± 10 vs. 75 ± 15 (p = 0.001), and the mean duration of the procedure was 64.72 vs. 93.89 minutes (p = 0.0001) in the ESPB group and the conscious sedation group, respectively. No block/anesthesia-related complications were reported in either group. Conclusion The combination of TSA with ESPB can be a novel, effective, and safe anesthetic technique for MT, offering better quality of recovery, improved postoperative analgesia, shorter procedure duration, and reduced perioperative morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.