ArticleCureus2026
Toward Ethical Governance of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Enabled Cognitive Monitoring in Aging Populations.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AI-enabled cognitive monitoring is increasingly being integrated into geriatric care, enabling continuous assessment of behavioral and cognitive patterns that can detect early cognitive changes. This editorial examines key ethical and governance challenges associated with these tools, including the epistemic opacity of machine-learning models, distributed clinical responsibility, dynamic consent for passive data collection, and the equitable performance of algorithms across diverse populations. It argues that addressing these challenges requires governance frameworks that clarify accountability, ensure interpretability, and protect patient autonomy while supporting clinical decision-making. By discussing these considerations, this piece provides a structured perspective on responsible innovation in AI-supported cognitive monitoring, advancing discourse on ethical integration of emerging digital tools in aging populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.