ArticleCureus2026
Laparoscopic Management of a Migrated Intrauterine Device Causing a Partial-Thickness Rectal Injury Diagnosed Following Contraceptive Failure: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are widely used long-acting reversible contraceptives due to their efficacy and safety. Although generally well tolerated, uterine perforation with subsequent migration into adjacent pelvic or abdominal organs is a rare but potentially serious complication. Rectal involvement is exceptionally uncommon and often clinically silent. We report the case of a 32-year-old woman who presented with complete abortion of an unintended pregnancy 18 months after IUD insertion. On physical examination, the IUD strings could not be visualized, and transvaginal ultrasound failed to locate the device within the uterine cavity. An abdominopelvic X-ray identified the IUD within the pelvic cavity. Diagnostic laparoscopy revealed the device embedded in the anterior rectal wall, resulting in a partial-thickness rectal wall injury. The IUD was successfully removed, and the rectal defect was repaired laparoscopically. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and she remained asymptomatic at follow-up. This case contributes to the limited literature on rectal wall injury secondary to IUD migration and highlights how such cases may remain undetected without a high index of suspicion and appropriate imaging. Early recognition and timely minimally invasive surgical management are essential to ensure optimal patient outcomes and to prevent serious complications, including abscess formation, fistula development, and bowel injury. This report underscores the importance of considering IUD migration and possible pelvic organ injury in patients presenting with missing strings or unintended pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.