ArticleCureus2026
Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on Patient-Healthcare Worker Communication in the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective communication between healthcare providers (HCPs) and patients is fundamental to quality emergency care. However, emergency department (ED) settings pose particular challenges due to time constraints, high patient volumes, and linguistic and cultural diversity. This study aimed to assess how physicians and nurses experience these communication barriers in a Saudi Arabian tertiary hospital ED and to identify factors associated with perceived communication difficulty.
methodsThis cross-sectional survey was executed at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from November to December 2024. A convenience sample of ED physicians and nurses was invited to complete a structured, self-administered questionnaire assessing communication barriers, empathy behaviors, and discharge practices. Data were analyzed using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables, and Mann-Whitney U tests for ordinal variables. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.
resultsAmong 157 respondents (78 physicians and 79 nurses), nurses reported greater communication difficulty (p<0.001) and higher perceived language and cultural barriers (both p<0.001). Interpreter access was lower among nurses (p<0.001). Although empathy behaviors were comparable, nurses reported higher participation in cross-cultural (51.9% vs. 10.3%) and empathy (48.1% vs. 28.2%) training. Language and cultural barriers demonstrated a moderate positive correlation (r=0.55, p<0.001), indicating a meaningful but not strong association. Furthermore, cumulative barrier exposure was associated with increased difficulty (p=0.008). Most providers (87.2%) delivered discharge instructions verbally.
conclusionCommunication experiences differed significantly between physicians and nurses, with nurses reporting greater difficulty and barrier exposure. These findings point out the need for targeted, evidence-based interventions such as improved interpreter access and communication training while recognizing that conclusions are limited by the study's cross-sectional, single-center design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.