ArticleCureus2026
Inter-observer and Intra-observer Reproducibility for the Determination of Female Urethral Narrowing on Voiding Cystourethrogram: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) is used in women to evaluate the anatomy of the lower urinary tract. Once common for detecting reflux, urethral mobility, and diverticula, its use in adults has declined. However, VCUG remains valuable in urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery (URPS) by identifying structural causes of recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTI), such as urethral pathology. Objective The main objective of this study is to evaluate the inter and intra-observer variability among radiologist interpretations of urethral caliber and narrowing on VCUG. Methods Following IRB approval, 83 VCUG cases performed on non-neurogenic women between 18 and 85 years old, and without prolapse >stage 2, were identified retrospectively from a tertiary care urology clinic between January and July 2023. All studies were performed in the upright sagittal oblique projection. Each image was independently reviewed by four abdominal fellowship-trained radiologists, who judged whether each urethra was narrow or not. If narrow, the rater noted severity (mild, moderate, severe) and location (proximal, mid, distal). The Shrout-Fleiss reliability statistic for a fixed set of raters (intra-class correlation (ICC): 3, k) was then calculated for the presence or absence of narrowing. Results In 50/83 (60%) of cases, all raters agreed on whether the urethra was narrow. Majority agreement (at least three of four raters) was present in 75/83 (90%) of cases. The ICC (3, k) was 0.79 for the reliability of the four scores. For the 61 cases rated as narrow by at least three of the four radiologists, the majority agreed on the degree of severity in 43/61 (70%; ICC = 0.89) of cases, and on location in 51/61 (84%; ICC = 0.43) of cases. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the inter-reader reproducibility of urethral narrowing on standing VCUG in women with lower urinary tract symptomatology. A majority agreement was reached on urethral narrowing, including its location and severity. Correlating VCUG findings with clinical data will help establish a standardized radiologic definition of urethral narrowing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.