ReviewCureus2026
Skin Blood Flowmotion in Various Disease States: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin blood flowmotion (FM) describes the spontaneous rhythmic changes in microvascular blood flow that occur as blood vessels dilate and constrict over time. These oscillations could occur secondary to several physiological influences, and their frequencies are often expressed as distinct frequency bands associated with cardiac activity, respiration, myogenic tone, neurogenic input, and endothelial factors. Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) is commonly used to measure these patterns and to analyze their frequency components. This scoping review examines peer-reviewed English-language studies on FM to better understand its physiological basis and potential relevance across various disease states. A systematic search of Embase, OVID, and Web of Science identified 445 unique articles that used LDF to evaluate FM in relation to a disease state. After screening titles and abstracts of English-language articles involving human subjects, relevant full texts were independently reviewed by two investigators, with a third reviewer resolving disagreements. Studies that focused only on healthy subjects or did not measure FM were excluded. The 41 studies that were included in the review identified several frequency bands in LDF recordings that reflect distinct regulatory mechanisms across disease states. Findings also show that factors such as sympathetic nerve activity, endothelial function, the anatomical site of measurement, and underlying disease can alter these FM oscillatory patterns and may be useful for early disease recognition. The literature also indicates that FM reflects multiple layers of microvascular regulation and may provide useful insights into early or subtle microcirculatory changes. Extended research is warranted that uses more standardized measurement approaches to further clarify clinical significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.