Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41694851›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

PROMISE‑MINO: A Prospective, Open‑Label, Multicenter, Single‑Arm, Phase IV Study of the Safety, Local Tolerability, and Efficacy of Topical Minocycline Hydrochloride 4% Gel in Indian Patients With Moderate‑to‑Severe Acne Vulgaris.

Vishalakshi Viswanath, Swetalina Pradhan, Mamta Bhura, Richa Gupta, Prerna Suryatale, H Banguru, Abhishek De, Vijay Sonkar, Sumit Bhushan, Rujuta Gadkari and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Vishalakshi ViswanathDepartment of Dermatology, Rajiv Gandhi Medical College (RGMC) Hospital, Thane, IND.
Swetalina PradhanDepartment of Dermatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND.
Mamta BhuraDepartment of Dermatology, New Leelamani Hospital, Kanpur, IND.
Richa GuptaDepartment of Dermatology, Aatman Hospital, Ahmedabad, IND.
Prerna SuryataleDepartment of Dermatology, Jeevan Rekha Hospital, Belgaum, IND.
H BanguruDepartment of Dermatology, Krishna Rajendra Hospital, Mysore, IND.
Abhishek DeDepartment of Dermatology, Wizderm Speciality Skin and Hair Clinic, Kolkata, IND.
Vijay SonkarDepartment of Dermatology, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, IND.
Sumit BhushanDepartment of Global Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited, Mumbai, IND.
Rujuta GadkariDepartment of Global Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited, Mumbai, IND.
Dhiraj DhootDepartment of Global Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited, Mumbai, IND.
Ashwin BalasubramanianDepartment of Global Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited, Mumbai, IND.
Saiprasad PatilDepartment of Global Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited, Mumbai, IND.
Hanmant BarkateDepartment of Global Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited, Mumbai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesWith increasing resistance to clindamycin, minocycline shows low resistance rates in

methodsThis prospective, open-label, multicenter, non-comparative, 12-week phase IV study included 256 patients aged ≥9 years with moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris and excluded those with other facial dermatological conditions. All patients received topical minocycline 4% gel once daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoints were the absolute local skin tolerability scores at week 12. The secondary endpoints included adverse events (AEs), changes in mean inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts, and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) treatment success at week 12 from baseline.

resultsOf 256 patients, 242 completed the study. A total of 100 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 65 patients (25.39%), of which 53 events in 42 (16.41%) were drug-related, with the majority being mild to moderate. These AEs were related to local tolerability and included pruritus (n = 26, 10.16%), erythema (n = 20, 7.81%), skin hyperpigmentation (n = 18, 7.03%), dry skin (n = 17, 6.64%), and exfoliation (n = 8, 3.13%). Reductions of 78% in inflammatory and 74% in non‑inflammatory acne lesions were observed at week 12, and 64.4% of patients achieved IGA treatment success.

conclusionsTopical minocycline 4% gel showed an acceptable safety and tolerability profile with no new safety signals. Additionally, there was a clinically significant reduction in both inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts, as well as a good IGA treatment success rate. Thus, it can be considered as an alternative for managing moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris.

Indexed as

acneefficacygelindiaminocycline 4%phase 4phase ivsafetytopical

Identifiers

PMID41694851
PMCPMC12906248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.