Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41694838›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Brain Metastasis After Curative Resection of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ryuichi Ohta, Kasumi Nishikawa, Kaoru Tanaka, Hidetoshi Hayashi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryuichi OhtaCommunity Care, Unnan City Hospital, Unnan, JPN.
Kasumi NishikawaFamily Medicine, Unnan City Hospital, Unnan, JPN.
Kaoru TanakaMedical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Sakai, JPN.
Hidetoshi HayashiMedical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Sakai, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metachronous brain metastasis is a clinically significant pattern of recurrence after curative-intent surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The extent to which contemporary clinicopathological and molecular characteristics predict postoperative intracranial relapse, and whether routine postoperative neuroimaging might aid early detection, remains uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting postoperative brain metastasis following curative resection for NSCLC. Fourteen retrospective cohort studies published between 2010 and 2025 were included, comprising 13,414 patients and 883 documented intracranial recurrence events. Data extraction focused on clinicopathological factors, molecular features, follow-up duration, and multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs). Only HRs derived from multivariable Cox regression models were pooled; studies reporting odds ratios without time-to-event adjustment were not combined quantitatively, ensuring comparability of effect estimates and minimizing confounding. The overall incidence of metachronous brain metastasis was approximately 6.6%. Routine postoperative brain imaging was implemented in only 28.6% of studies, whereas the majority relied on symptom-triggered neuroimaging. Adenocarcinoma was the predominant histology, accounting for 45-100% of cases. Although EGFR mutation was variably associated with increased intracranial recurrence, the pooled estimate demonstrated substantial heterogeneity (I² = 86.1%), limiting interpretability. In contrast, traditional clinicopathological factors-including nodal involvement, visceral pleural invasion, tumor differentiation, smoking history, and chronic pulmonary comorbidities-showed more consistent associations across multivariable models with low to moderate heterogeneity. Considerable heterogeneity in imaging strategies and molecular reporting was observed. Metachronous brain metastasis remains an important postoperative recurrence pattern in surgically treated NSCLC. Clinicopathological and host-related factors appear to be more consistently predictive than molecular features alone. Whether selected high-risk patients may benefit from scheduled rather than purely symptom-driven postoperative brain imaging warrants further prospective investigation. Standardized surveillance protocols and integration of clinical, pathological, and molecular determinants are essential to improve risk stratification and to facilitate earlier detection of intracranial relapse.

Indexed as

brain neoplasmslocal neoplasm metastasismagnetic resonance imagingneoplasm recurrencenon-small cell lung carcinomarisk factors

Identifiers

PMID41694838
PMCPMC12900982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.