Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41694835›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Evidence-Based Patient Triage: Optimizing Healthcare Delivery Through Appropriate Site-of-Care Selection.

Dianna Ehlert

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dianna EhlertVascular Surgery, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare systems face increasing pressure from emergency department overcrowding, rising costs, and suboptimal patient outcomes. This paper presents a narrative evidence synthesis and integrative review of the published literature on patient triage systems that direct patients to appropriate care settings (emergency departments, urgent care centers, and primary care facilities). The evidence synthesis methodology employed combines findings from systematic reviews, observational studies, cost-effectiveness analyses, and quality improvement reports to provide a comprehensive overview of triage implementation and outcomes. Data sources include peer-reviewed publications from emergency medicine, primary care, and health services research journals; government health statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); professional organization reports from the Urgent Care Association of America and American College of Emergency Physicians; and health system performance data. References span from 2003 to 2023, with emphasis on studies published in the past decade to reflect current patterns of healthcare delivery. This integrative approach allows for the practical application of research findings to real-world healthcare delivery challenges. While individual studies may have methodological limitations, the convergence of evidence across multiple research designs, settings, and populations strengthens confidence in the key conclusions. Evidence strongly supports implementing structured patient triage protocols to direct patients to the most appropriate care setting among emergency departments, urgent care centers, and primary care facilities.

Indexed as

appropriate site of careemergency department triageoptimizing healthcare deliveryquality improvementquality improvement research

Identifiers

PMID41694835
PMCPMC12906281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.