ArticleCureus2026
The Effects of Military Occupation on Semen Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Infertility is becoming increasingly common, with a large contribution from male factor infertility. The majority of active-duty service members are men in their prime reproductive years. There are factors unique to the military that could impact fertility, including occupational, traumatic, and psychological exposures. However, there is limited research in the military population that analyzes a potential link between occupational exposures and the risk of male infertility. Material and methods A retrospective review of semen analyses was conducted between 2020 and 2022 at a large military treatment facility in the United States. The occupational code for each individual was queried from the Defense Manpower Data Center Reporting System (DMDCRS). Patients were excluded if their semen analysis was conducted after receiving a vasectomy or chemotherapy. If multiple semen analyses for a single individual were collected, the most favorable was selected. Results A total of 1008 semen analyses were reviewed, of which 551 semen analyses met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in sperm concentration, total motile count, or the number of individuals with low spermatozoa concentration (≤15 million/mL) between the occupational groups (p=0.77). A secondary analysis found that trainer pilots had significantly lower spermatozoa concentrations compared to fighter pilots (p= 0.028). Conclusions This study did not find an increased risk of male infertility in any of the occupational groups. Strengths of this study include the large number of semen analyses included, focusing on the major portions of the semen analysis associated most with the risk for male infertility, and utilizing the DMDCRS to associate with potential work exposures, reducing risk for reporting bias. Weaknesses of the study include its retrospective nature, which could introduce selection bias given a mixture of individuals undergoing semen analysis for infertility or other reasons, the fact that semen analysis is a surrogate marker only for infertility, and that this was only conducted at a single military base. Different bases/missions may lead to variable exposures that could be associated with infertility. Future studies should increase the number of military bases included and consider longitudinal outcomes such as pregnancy or live birth rates. Assessing and minimizing the impact of military occupational exposures on the risk for male infertility is of particular importance due to the significant financial and emotional burden associated with the evaluation and treatment of infertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.