Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41694824›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Preeclampsia With and Without Proteinuria.

Chaiti Saha, Shikha Chadha, Neha Agrawal, Hima Chandana Kille, Puneeta Mahajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chaiti SahaObstetrics and Gynaecology, Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Delhi, IND.
Shikha ChadhaObstetrics and Gynaecology, Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Delhi, IND.
Neha AgrawalObstetrics and Gynaecology, Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Delhi, IND.
Hima Chandana KilleObstetrics and Gynaecology, Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Delhi, IND.
Puneeta MahajanObstetrics and Gynaecology, Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Delhi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Preeclampsia is the commonest medical complication of pregnancy and can be associated with significant maternal as well as neonatal morbidity and mortality. Proteinuria is the most consistent finding of preeclampsia, though it's not a must, according to the latest guidelines. However, proteinuria is considered one of the features of preeclampsia, and it is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. The role of proteinuria remains controversial as a prognostic marker due to variable correlation with severity; it may appear late in renal involvement. Also, gestational age and other end-organ involvement may influence the management decisions. This comparative study aims to examine whether the presence of proteinuria correlates with poorer maternal and neonatal outcomes. Material and methods A prospective observational study was conducted at a referral hospital. Six hundred women with preeclampsia after 24 weeks of gestation were included in the study, 300 in each group A & B, that is, preeclampsia with & without proteinuria, respectively. Proteinuria was assessed using a urine dipstick value of 2+ or more. All women were evaluated for end-organ involvement or uteroplacental insufficiency. Women were treated according to hospital protocol. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were studied and statistically analyzed. Quantitative variables were compared using an unpaired t-test. Qualitative variable has been compared using the Chi-square test /Fisher's exact test. Results Overall maternal complications, where all complications were weighted equally, were significantly higher in Group A (96.3% vs 70.3%, p<0.0001).With a higher incidence of eclampsia (p=0.012), abruptio placenta (p=0.002), and hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet (HELLP) syndrome. Renal, hepatic, and hematological dysfunctions were more prevalent in Group B, posing serious challenges. Group A had a significantly higher percentage of overall neonatal complications: 44.6% vs 23.9% (p<0.0001), stillbirths (7.67% vs 1.67%), and intrauterine growth restrictions (IUGR) (12.33% vs 3.33%). Group B had higher rates of intrauterine deaths (IUD) (5.33% vs 0%), and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions were higher in Group B (p<0.0001). Thus, proteinuria appears to be a strong marker of poor neonatal health. Conclusion The study emphasizes that proteinuria, while important, is not the single most important factor in determining maternal and neonatal outcomes. Maternal and fetal outcomes also depend on other clinical factors, including systemic organ involvement and maternal comorbidities. This study affirms that women with proteinuria showed more neonatal and obstetric maternal complications, but women with non-proteinuric preeclampsia can still be associated with significant biochemical derangements and pose difficulties in management.

Indexed as

endorgan dysfunstionmaternal and fetal outcomepreeclampsiapreeclampsia complicationsproteinuriasevere preeclampsia

Identifiers

PMID41694824
PMCPMC12904301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.