Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41694777›Full record

Trial reportJournal of graduate medical education2026

Round34: Attending-Moderated Tabletop Gameplay to Enhance Resident Team Dynamics During Inpatient Rounds.

Saqib H Baig, Michael Q Dong, Shruti Sirapu, Vincent Chan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of graduate medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saqib H Baigis an Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Jane and Leonard Korman Respiratory Institute, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5890-449X
Michael Q Dongis a PGY-5 Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellow, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Jane and Leonard Korman Respiratory Institute, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2819-0208
Shruti Sirapuis a Medical Student, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Jane and Leonard Korman Respiratory Institute, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Vincent Chanis an Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Jane and Leonard Korman Respiratory Institute, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1795-4826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Inpatient medical rounds are central to experiential learning in residency education but are often challenged by high team turnover and hierarchal dynamics, limiting team engagement, comfort in asking questions, and education. Gamification can address these challenges. Objective: To evaluate the impact of Round34, an investigator-developed cooperative card game designed to improve health care team dynamics on residents' engagement in rounds, comfort in asking questions, and perceived educational value of rounds. Methods: In a 22-week prospective randomized trial at a single academic center in 2024, paired inpatient internal medicine teams were randomized to intervention (game) or control (standard rounds) groups. Round34, played during teaching rounds, included prompts ranging from humor to clinical questions to facilitate interaction. Residents completed daily 10-point Likert surveys on perceived educational value of rounds, engagement, and comfort in asking questions (primary outcomes). Weekly surveys measured secondary outcomes of burnout (Maslach Burnout Inventory), well-being (Resident & Fellow Well-Being Index), and loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale). Rounding time was recorded daily. Outcomes were analyzed with ordinal regression adjusted for patient volume (total/new), call days, and round duration. Results: From 274 of 455 possible daily and 54 of 91 possible weekly responses, the intervention group reported higher scores for perceived education (8.0 vs 6.2, Conclusions: Round34 boosted perceived educational value, engagement, and comfort during rounds, without increasing rounding time.

Indexed as

Internal MedicineInternship and ResidencyPatient Care TeamTeaching RoundsFemaleGroup DynamicsHumansInpatientsMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID41694777
PMCPMC12903261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.