Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41694747›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Love of neighbor assessment: validity, reliability, and a template for measurement.

Tyler J VanderWeele, R Noah Padgett, Brendan W Case, Richard G Cowden, Jeffrey Hanson, Christina Hinton, Ni Made Taganing Kurniati, Tim Lomas, Katelyn N G Long, Ryan M Niemiec and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Tyler J VanderWeeleDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
R Noah PadgettDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Brendan W CaseHuman Flourishing Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Richard G CowdenHuman Flourishing Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Jeffrey HansonHuman Flourishing Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Christina HintonHuman Flourishing Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Ni Made Taganing KurniatiGunadarma University, Depok, West Java, Indonesia.
Tim LomasHuman Flourishing Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Katelyn N G LongHuman Flourishing Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Ryan M NiemiecVIA Institute on Character, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Andrea Ortega BecharaUniversidad del Sinú, Montería, Colombia.
Jonathan C RutledgeHuman Flourishing Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Jonathan TeubnerHuman Flourishing Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Sophia TownGabelli School of Business, Fordham University, Bronx, NY, United States.
Renae WilkinsonHuman Flourishing Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Matthew T LeeHuman Flourishing Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Love of neighbor holds a prominent place in ethical and theological thinking across many cultures and world religious traditions. While arguably central to the promotion of societal wellbeing and human flourishing, little has been done on its empirical assessment. We present a measure of love of neighbor, grounded in a broader conceptual framework concerning interpersonal love, and examine its psychometric properties using cognitive interviews and analyses from datasets from numerous countries, cultures, and contexts. We present evidence for two distinct facets: unitive and contributory neighbor love. We discuss distinctions of unitive and contributory neighbor love from compassionate love, which might be conceived of as contributory neighbor love within the context of suffering. Psychometric properties of the measure concerning consistency, reliability, internal structure, relations between indicators, and measurement invariance are presented. The measure lays the foundation for future empirical study of the distribution, causes, and consequences of love of neighbor.

Indexed as

flourishingloveneighborreliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID41694747
PMCPMC12903778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.