ArticlePerspectives in clinical research
Impact of educational intervention on knowledge and awareness of good clinical practice among healthcare professionals at a tertiary care teaching hospital.
Article in Perspectives in clinical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Good clinical practice (GCP) ensures ethical, as well as scientific quality of clinical trials, thus safeguarding participant safety and data integrity. The drug controller general of India mandates GCP training for healthcare professionals who conduct clinical research. However, limited studies assess the effectiveness of such training programs in India. Aim: This study evaluates the impact of educational intervention on the knowledge and awareness of GCP among healthcare professionals. Settings and Design: A prospective, interventional study was conducted at our tertiary care teaching hospital. Materials and Methods: A total of 180 healthcare professionals participated in a GCP workshop, with 172 completing pre- and post-intervention questionnaires. The workshop covered essential GCP topics, including ethical guidelines, informed consent, regulatory requirements, and serious adverse event reporting. Statistical Analysis Used: Pre- and postintervention responses were analyzed using Fischer's exact test in GraphPad Prism 8.4.2. Results: The study revealed a significant improvement in participants' knowledge across multiple GCP domains. However, gaps remained in understanding specific regulatory timelines. Conclusion: Educational interventions, such as GCP workshops, significantly enhance healthcare professionals' knowledge and awareness, improving compliance with ethical and regulatory requirements in clinical research. Integrating GCP training into medical education may further strengthen research practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.