ArticlePerspectives in clinical research
Efficacy and safety of topical phenytoin cream in diabetic foot ulcers: A randomized, open-label, parallel, and proof-of-concept study.
Article in Perspectives in clinical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a severe diabetes complication, often leading to amputations. Despite medical advancements, no standard treatment exists. Conventional care is insufficient, prompting research into new therapies. Aims and Objectives: Phenytoin, an antiepileptic drug, has shown potential in wound healing by stimulating fibroblast proliferation. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of topical phenytoin cream versus standard care for DFUs. Materials and Methods: This randomized, open-label trial was conducted at a tertiary hospital in India. Adults with diabetes and full-thickness lower extremity ulcers (Grade IA or II, University of Texas Classification) were randomized 1:1 to receive either topical phenytoin 1% cream or saline dressing daily for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was complete ulcer healing at 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes were healing time, ulcer size reduction, and adverse events. The primary outcome was analysed using the Chi-square test for independence, while secondary outcomes, namely time to wound closure, the percentage reduction in ulcer surface area and incidence of adverse events were analysed using the log-rank test, Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test respectively. Results: Among 28 participants, two were lost to follow-up. Healing rates were 23% (phenytoin) vs. 53% (saline) (p=0.102). Median healing time was 8 weeks in both groups (p=0.142). Ulcer size reduction was greater with saline (89.19% ± 17.33%) than phenytoin (56.51% ± 46.11%; p=0.037). Adverse events were fewer with phenytoin (p=0.431). Conclusion: Topical phenytoin was safe but not superior. Larger trials are needed to confirm its role in DFU treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.