ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2026
Polarizer-assisted pupillometry through closed eyelids, overcoming pupil position dependence.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Light sources and detectors: applications in nanoscale imaging, sensing, and actuation.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Accurate monitoring of pupil size and gaze direction is critical in clinical and research contexts; however, current pupillometry methods require open eyes, limiting their use in patients under anesthesia, sedation, or sleep. Short-wave infrared (SWIR) imaging enables noninvasive closed-eye pupillometry, but challenges remain due to eyelid glare, gaze variability, and low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Aim: We aimed to enhance closed-eye pupillometry by integrating polarization filters into the SWIR imaging system and developing improved algorithms for pupil localization and gaze direction estimation under natural closed-eye conditions. Approach: Experiments were conducted on healthy volunteers using SWIR imaging with different polarizer configurations (parallel, partially crossed, crossed, and no polarizers). Pupillary light reflexes (PLR) were recorded under open- and closed-eye conditions with both forward fixation and varying gaze directions. Image analysis incorporated brightness difference imaging and statistical modeling to evaluate maximal brightness change and SNR. Results: In open-eye settings, parallel polarizers produced the strongest PLR signal, but in closed-eye conditions, crossed polarizers significantly improved image quality by suppressing eyelid glare. The crossed configuration yielded the highest PLR brightness change and SNR compared with parallel or no polarizers, enabling reliable pupil localization across multiple gaze directions. Improved algorithms allowed robust PLR detection even under natural eyelid closure and variable gaze positions. Conclusions: Integrating crossed polarizers into SWIR-based pupillometry substantially enhances signal fidelity and pupil localization through closed eyelids. This approach overcomes major limitations of previous methods and enables accurate, touchless pupillometry in clinically relevant conditions. These advances pave the way for applications in anesthesiology, sleep medicine, and neurocritical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.