ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Best practices for the collection and analysis of patient experience data from social media for patient-focused drug development.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathways to Real World Evidence From the Real World of School-Based Physical Fitness Testing (SB-PFT).Learning health systems · 2026Article
- Empowering AI assisted clinical drug development: tactics to address data bias, the digital divide and missing patient populations through AI and digital solutions.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient experience data derived from social media captures the unsolicited conversations of patients and helps in understanding their subjective experiences with disease and treatments. By comparison, many other real-world datasets, such as electronic health records, have the drawback that they solely capture the perspective of health care practitioners. Regulators such as the FDA or EMA have recognized the potential of social media as a source of patient experience data that can inform patient-focused drug development. While social media has limitations, such as the reliance on patient or caregiver self-reporting, it allows us to understand the subjective perception and context of patients, how they experience their condition, its progression, existing treatments and how they manage these, which unmet needs they have, and how the disease affects their daily lives and activities. All this is crucial information that can inform drug development initiatives, and help substantiate relevant outcomes measured, both in clinical trials as well as in post-marketing evidence generation activities. This paper proposes best practices for Social Media Listening (SML) for the purpose of Real World Evidence generation along the following dimensions: purposes and objectives of a SML study, data collection, and data analysis. To illustrate how these best practices can be adopted, we showcase their application in a case study, aiming to unveil the key symptoms and comorbidities that diabetes type II patients face and how these affect their quality of life across an observation period of 24 months. We believe the proposed best practices will contribute to provide a rigorous methodological ground for the use of social media in generating patient experience data that can inform patient-focused drug development and could be accepted in regulatory processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.