ArticleJournal of clinical practice and research2025
Beyond Conventional Blood Parameters: Novel Hematologic Indices for Interpretable Artificial Intelligence in Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Article in Journal of clinical practice and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, emphasizing the need for timely and accurate diagnosis. This study evaluates the diagnostic potential of newly derived hematological indices-mean platelet volume-to-platelet count ratio (MPR), platelet-to-white blood cell ratio (PWR), red cell distribution width-to-lymphocyte ratio (RLR), red cell distribution width-to-platelet ratio (RPR), Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI), and derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR)-combined with conventional blood parameters. Materials and Methods: An open-access dataset with 981 participants (477 AMI patients and 504 healthy controls) was analyzed. Feature selection was performed using the ReliefF algorithm to identify the most informative features. At the same time, class imbalance was addressed using the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) for multi-class classification (control, ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI], and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI]). Random Forest (RF) and Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost) classifiers were utilized for both binary and multi-class tasks. Results: In binary classification (Control vs. AMI), RF achieved 84.92% accuracy and 91.25% area under the curve (AUC), while balanced multi-class classification reached 80.75% accuracy with RF, demonstrating consistent and robust performance across cross-validation folds. Conclusion: The findings highlight the added value of derived indices that reflect systemic inflammation, immune response, and platelet activity in enhancing the diagnosis of AMI. The proposed framework offers a reliable, interpretable, and clinically applicable approach to support early detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.