ArticleJournal of clinical practice and research2025
Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Abscesses Detected on Computed Tomography in Neck Infections.
Article in Journal of clinical practice and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological findings of neck abscesses detected by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in emergency patients, and to analyze treatment approaches and the impact of abscess localization on outcomes. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients admitted between January 2018 and January 2024 with a CT-confirmed neck abscess. Data included demographics, abscess characteristics (size, side, location, extension), treatment methods, microbiological and pathological results, complications, and prognosis. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test for age and abscess size, and the Chi-square test for location and treatment. Results: Ninety-two patients (32 women; mean age: 37.79±16.49 years) were evaluated. The most frequent abscesses were peritonsillar (n=36) and odontogenic (n=33). The median abscess sizes were 30 mm (interquartile range, IQR: 18) and 18 mm (IQR: 11). Twelve patients showed extension to adjacent spaces. Local drainage with intravenous antibiotics was the most common treatment. Microbial growth was detected in 18 cases. Two patients (2.2%) died during follow-up, both requiring surgical drainage under general anesthesia. Peritonsillar abscesses were smaller than odontogenic and other deep neck abscesses (p<0.001). The treatment method showed no correlation with abscess size or etiology (χ Conclusion: Deep neck infections most commonly arise from peritonsillar and odontogenic sources. Contrast-enhanced CT is crucial for diagnosis, treatment planning, and early detection of complications. Although no significant association was found between abscess size and treatment method, larger abscesses more often required drainage under general anesthesia. Prompt imaging and timely intervention remain vital to reduce morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.