ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2026
Building recommendations for Mandatory Continuing Medical Education in developing countries: A nominal group study of regional experts.
Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Internationally, mandatory Continuing Medical Education (CME), tied to re-registration, has enhanced physicians' skills in developed nations. However, success rates have been inconsistent in developing countries. The current literature highlights the disparity in the availability of CME activities in the Southeast Asian and Eastern Mediterranean regions. This study aims to identify the most crucial elements that will serve as a blueprint for the optimal implementation of mandatory CME in developing countries. Methods: Following the development of 31 recommendations through a review of the literature of 33 countries in Southeast Asian and Eastern Mediterranean regions regarding the status of CME, a narrative review of five of these countries that have implemented mandatory CME, and in-depth exploration of the experiences and practices of CME providers in Pakistan, we used a nominal group technique with regional experts to identify those that are most crucial. An online meeting was held to establish recommendations for implementing CME in developing nations using a hypothetical developing country. Two rounds of discussion occurred during this consensus-building process. Results: The expert panel identified eight recommendations within the themes of educational design, delivery, and CME governance as the most relevant for implementing mandatory CME in developing nations. These include topics of national significance determined by a central body as desirable components of a CME programme, a combination of online and face-to-face methods, support for developing institutions that are currently active in providing CME in rural settings, accrediting a wide range of CME providers, forming a national CME committee under the national physician regulatory body, a predetermined phase-in period before full implementation of mandatory CME, developing guidelines to regulate and control commercial sponsorship of CME events, and broadening the definition of full disclosure. Discussion: These eight recommendations are likely to benefit developing nations that may be attempting to implement or revamp mandatory CME.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.