ArticleF1000Research2025
A Differential Evolution-Based Optimized Ensemble for Balanced and Imbalanced Medical Datasets.
Article in F1000Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Large Language Models for Heterogeneous Data Mining in Liver Disease: Framework Development and Retrospective Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Class imbalance is a frequent and severe problem in medical datasets, where instances from the minority class are usually high risk or disease positive. Most traditional classifiers suffer from a biasness towards the majority class, resulting in a poor detection rate of the minority class and, therefore, decreased confidence in prediction systems in medical applications. Methods: In this paper, we present an optimized ensemble by differential evolution (OEDE), a novel ensemble learning framework, to address this problem. OEDE harmonizes three dissimilar base learners (Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost) and trains each using class-balancing techniques. Next, the model utilized Differential Evolution (DE) to discover the most appropriate ensemble weights to maximize the area under the ROC curve (AUC) on a validation dataset. Result: We conducted experiments on four real-world medical datasets, whose imbalance ratios vary from 1.89 to 14.6, using OEDE in the original, SMOTE, and ADASYN balanced conditions. Experimental results demonstrate substantial performance gain of OEDE on the challenging Thoracic dataset, achieving a 70.08% AUC, outperforming the standard Random Forest (50.82%) and AdaBoost (47.15%) baselines by over 19%. Additionally, on the Cervical Cancer dataset, the model achieved a peak AUC of 97.89%. The results indicate that the proposed OEDE consistently outperforms or is competitive with traditional ensemble models in terms of AUC, F1-score, and Recall. ROC curve analysis also approved the OEDE's superior discriminative capabilities. Conclusion: The proposed OEDE framework effectively improves minority class detection in imbalance medical datasets. Its robust and flexible design makes it a promising tool for healthcare risk prediction tasks where minority class groups need to be well identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.