Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41694616›Full record

ArticleInfectious Disease Modelling2026

Ensemble-labeling of infectious disease time series to evaluate early warning systems.

Andreas Hicketier, Moritz Bach, Philip Oedi, Alexander Ullrich, Auss Abbood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andreas HicketierRobert Koch Institute, Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Moritz BachRobert Koch Institute, Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Philip OediRobert Koch Institute, Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Alexander UllrichRobert Koch Institute, Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Auss AbboodRobert Koch Institute, Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early warning systems (EWSs) for detecting disease outbreaks can help make informed public health decisions and organize necessary responses. During the COVID-19 pandemic, several EWSs were proposed that use covariates such as mobility or social media data for improved timeliness and precision. Evaluating these EWSs is not trivial, since we do not have the ground truth knowledge about outbreaks of COVID-19. Workarounds for missing labels are to simulate them or produce them post hoc. Simulating COVID-19 outbreaks for evaluation is not feasible with highly complex covariates such as mobility. Furthermore, existing post hoc labeling methods do not perform well on heterogeneous COVID-19 time series. To address this evaluation gap, we propose an adaptive labeling method that produces useful labels (time-indexed annotations marking outbreak-like periods) for highly heterogeneous, nonstationary COVID-19 time series. To this end, we develop a customized ensemble of labeling methods. We find that our method consistently produces useful labels for various outbreak types, such as waves and short peaks occurring at different spatial resolutions. Lastly, we use our self-produced labels to train machine learning models and compare their performance with traditional outbreak detection methods. We find that models trained with our labels outperform classical, unsupervised outbreak detection algorithms.

Indexed as

COVID-19Early warning systemOutbreak detectionSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID41694616
PMCPMC12905992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.