Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41694555›Full record

ArticleBiodiversity data journal2026

Flower-visiting assemblages of arable lands and orchards in the eastern Pannonian Lowland, studied with volatile traps.

Aletta Ősz, Kálmán Szanyi, Dóra Arnóczkyné Jakab, Szabolcs Szanyi, Sándor Koczor, Miklós Tóth, István Szarukán, Antal Nagy

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aletta ŐszPlant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Research Network, Herman Otto u. 15., H-1022, Budapest, Hungary Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Research Network, Herman Otto u. 15., H-1022 Budapest Hungary https://ror.org/04w6pnc49.
Kálmán SzanyiFaculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Debrecen, H-4032, Debrecen, Hungary Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen Hungary https://ror.org/02xf66n48.
Dóra Arnóczkyné JakabFaculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Debrecen, H-4032, Debrecen, Hungary Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen Hungary https://ror.org/02xf66n48.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9276-4494
Szabolcs SzanyiFaculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Debrecen, H-4032, Debrecen, Hungary Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen Hungary https://ror.org/02xf66n48.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2642-9839
Sándor KoczorPlant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Research Network, Herman Otto u. 15., H-1022, Budapest, Hungary Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Research Network, Herman Otto u. 15., H-1022 Budapest Hungary https://ror.org/04w6pnc49.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8751-157X
Miklós TóthPlant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Research Network, Herman Otto u. 15., H-1022, Budapest, Hungary Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Research Network, Herman Otto u. 15., H-1022 Budapest Hungary https://ror.org/04w6pnc49.
István SzarukánFaculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Debrecen, H-4032, Debrecen, Hungary Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen Hungary https://ror.org/02xf66n48.
Antal NagyFaculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Debrecen, H-4032, Debrecen, Hungary Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen Hungary https://ror.org/02xf66n48.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1304-817X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pollinator assemblages of different habitats are widely studied, but sampling methodologies and covering of lesser-known pollinators and other flower-visitor taxa (e.g., floriphagous species) need improvement to obtain reliable data on the structure and functioning of these communities. We assessed flower-visiting insect assemblages in arable lands and apple orchards of the eastern Pannonian Lowland using phenylacetaldehyde-based volatile traps originally developed for pest monitoring. In seven sites, 27,539 individuals belonging to 123 species and seven insect orders were recorded. On average, over 90% of the captured insects were potential pollinators, with a higher proportion in orchards (98%) than in arable lands (85%). In orchards, the dominant groups were Hymenoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera and Neuroptera, while in arable lands, Lepidoptera were most abundant. Floriphagous and pest species were more numerous in arable lands. These results demonstrate that phenylacetaldehyde-baited traps are easy to use, standardized, and sufficiently efficient for assessing of flower-visiting assemblages. Beyond their application in pest monitoring, they can provide reliable data on the flower-visiting and pollinator assemblages in different natural and agricultural habitats.

Indexed as

agroecosystemalfalfa fieldapple orchardfloral scentpest monitoringphenylacetaldehydepollinator assemblages

Identifiers

PMID41694555
PMCPMC12895183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.