ArticleStatistics in biosciences2026
Canopy2: Tumor Phylogeny Inference by Bulk DNA and Single-Cell RNA Sequencing.
Article in Statistics in biosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phylogenetic tree inference from single-cell RNA sequencing data with SCITE-RNA.Genome biology · 2026Article
- distQTL: distribution quantitative trait loci identification by population-scale single-cell data.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- distQTL: Distribution Quantitative Trait Loci Identification by Population-Scale Single-Cell Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Single-Cell Multiomic Analysis of Circadian Rhythmicity in Mouse Liver.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Deconvolution and Phylogeny Inference of Diverse Variant Types Integrating Bulk DNA-seq with Single-cell RNA-seq.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Deconvolution and phylogeny inference of diverse variant types integrating bulk DNA-seq with single-cell RNA-seq.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumors are comprised of a mixture of distinct cell populations that differ in terms of genetic makeup and function. Such heterogeneity plays a role in the development of drug resistance and the ineffectiveness of targeted cancer therapies. Insight into this complexity can be obtained through the construction of a phylogenetic tree, which illustrates the evolutionary lineage of tumor cells as they acquire mutations over time. We propose Canopy2, a Bayesian framework that uses single nucleotide variants derived from bulk DNA and single-cell RNA sequencing to infer tumor phylogeny and conduct mutational profiling of tumor subpopulations. Canopy2 uses Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to sample from a joint probability distribution involving a mixture of binomial and beta-binomial distributions, specifically chosen to account for the sparsity and stochasticity of the single-cell data. Canopy2 demystifies the sources of zeros in the single-cell data and separates zeros categorized as non-cancerous (cells without mutations), stochastic (mutations not expressed due to bursting), and technical (expressed mutations not picked up by sequencing). Simulations demonstrate that Canopy2 consistently outperforms competing methods and reconstructs the clonal tree with high fidelity, even in situations involving low sequencing depth, poor single-cell yield, and highly-advanced and polyclonal tumors. We further assess the performance of Canopy2 through application to breast cancer and glioblastoma data, benchmarking against existing methods. Canopy2 is an open-source R package available at https://github.com/annweideman/canopy2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.