Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41694503›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Nudge for governmental change in health policy.

Hatem H Alsaqqa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hatem H AlsaqqaPublic Health Department and Deanship of Scientific Research, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Legislation, regulation, and information supply are classic policy tools used to influence behavior. Policies that 'nudge' people in specific directions have recently attracted the attention of policy analysts, based on the growing realization that context has a significant and mostly automatic impact on behavior. This perspective article examines the health behavior change and explores the theoretical underpinnings of why nudges might be effective. Governmental behavior change policies and interventions in the healthcare industry have historically tended to concentrate on educating people, changing their perspective on their behavior, or offering alternative legal incentives that alter the consequences of their actions. Therefore, choice architecture interventions seek to direct people toward personally and socially desirable behavior without the use of education or substantial incentives. They do this by creating settings and incorporating people's limitations when making decisions in order to support the evaluation and comparison of available choice alternatives, facilitate access to information that is relevant to decisions, or reinforce actions that have already been formed. Researchers in health policy implementation must continue to analyze the impact of nudges by providing access to health data and facilitating ongoing evidence-based evaluation of nudge-based health policies, even though they have successfully influenced health behavior in some areas. Last but not least, multifaceted and comprehensive approaches to health policy that combine both conventional policies and behaviorally informed solutions are the only way to effectively address the multiple and complicated health issues facing our countries.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth PolicyHealth PromotionPolicy MakingChoice BehaviorHumansbehaviorchangehealthnudgepolicy

Identifiers

PMID41694503
PMCPMC12901451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.