ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2026
Optimizing
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnhancing the professionalism of physicians in diagnosing and treating
aimTo explore the effectiveness of a single training course on
methodsThis was a prospective, before-and-after, non-randomized interventional study based on real-world data. From March 2022 to December 2023, each physician enrolled 25 patients and acquired review outcomes, before they underwent professional training. Following this educational intervention, each physician proceeded to enroll an additional cohort of 25 patients and obtained subsequent review results for comparison. The primary outcome was a comparison of
resultsIn total, 20 physicians and 1000 patients were finally analyzed. After training, the eradication rates improved significantly in both intention-to-treat analysis [58.6%
conclusionA one-time training course on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.