ArticleTransplantation direct2026
Differences in Mortality by Donor Sex and Age in a Multinational Cohort of Liver Transplant Recipients.
Article in Transplantation direct, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk Factors for Dysfunctional Liver Graft Response: A Case-Control Study.Nursing & health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prior studies assessing the association between donor sex and liver transplant outcomes showed conflicting results. We hypothesized that donor age, recipient sex, and time posttransplant modify the relationship between donor sex and mortality. Methods: First deceased donor liver transplant recipients 13 y or older recorded in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and the Collaborative Transplant Study (n = 198 856; 1988-2019) were studied. We used multivariable Cox models to estimate the association between donor sex and mortality, accounting for the modifying effects of recipient sex, donor age (13-44, 45-59, ≥60 y), and time posttransplant (<3 versus ≥3 mo). Results from cohort-specific Cox models were combined using a 2-stage individual-patient data meta-analysis. Results: Among male recipients, early posttransplant mortality was higher with female than male donors (only statistically significant with donors aged 13-44 y); subsequently, mortality was higher with female than male donors aged 13-44 y but Conclusions: Donor age modifies the association between donor sex and mortality. Among male recipients, young female donors were associated with higher mortality than young male donors, but female donors older than 45 y may offer superior long-term patient survival than same-aged male donors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.