ArticleTransplantation direct2026
Donor Time to Death and DCD Liver Transplant Outcomes: Challenging the Dogma That Shorter Is Better.
Article in Transplantation direct, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Time to Death and Donation After Circulatory Death Kidney Transplant Outcomes: Opportunities for Improved Utilization in the United States.Clinical transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In circulatory death transplantation, time to death (TTD) following withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment is unpredictable. Concerns persist that prolonged TTD may cause ischemic injury, resulting in organ nonuse. We assessed the impact of donor TTD on liver transplant outcomes and utilization. Methods: We used Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data on adult donors after circulatory death transplants (2010-2025). Multivariable nonlinear (restricted cubic splines) regression models were used to analyze associations. Simulation studies estimated potential increases in liver acceptance rates. Results: In 8489 recipients, short donor TTD was associated with inferior outcome, contrary to popular belief. Prolonged TTD did not show inferior posttransplant outcomes, irrespective of whether normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) was used. Nonlinear modeling (n = 37 447) revealed a sharp decline in utilization once TTD exceeded just 15 min. Given prolonged TTD did not impact outcomes, these declines represent a missed opportunity for organ use. Simulation studies revealed that if surgeons assess organ offers from patients with TTD of 15-30 min identically to those with TTD <10 min, there would have been a 17.1% (95% confidence interval, 15.0%-19.3%) relative increase in utilization, with potentially better outcomes than current practice. In the setting of NRP, short TTD was associated with increased organ nonuse, potentially because of failed viability criteria in damaged livers. Conclusions: Short TTD was associated with inferior posttransplant outcome, challenging the dogma that shorter is better. Prolonged TTD did not negatively impact posttransplant outcomes, irrespective of NRP use. These findings support expanded use of liver donors with prolonged TTD, especially in the era of NRP and advanced perfusion, where viability assessment provides an additional safeguard.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.