ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Sensory modality- and load-dependent changes across cortical working memory representations.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While distributed cortical areas represent working memory contents, their necessity for memory maintenance has been questioned. Here, we examined the differential effects of maintaining multiple items on the neural information across cortical regions. In each trial of the fMRI experiment, participants (n = 81) had to memorize two items, each either an orientation or a pure pitch, for 13.8 s and continuously recalled the target after the delay. We kept the overall working memory load constant, but varied the sensory modality of each item to vary the effective visual load. We find significant information for orientations in visual, parietal, and frontal areas. We show that increasing visual load decreased behavioural recall performance and orientation-specific information in visual cortex. Parietal areas were affected only early in the delay, whilst frontal representations were unaffected by load. Simulations show that this drop in decodable information is best interpreted as a drop in mnemonic information represented by multivoxel patterns. Our results provide evidence for shared labour of visual cortices, where maintaining two versus one orientation leads to a loss in representational fidelity, and anterior cortices, where multiple items could be represented in a more robust but less precise format.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.