ArticleRadiology advances2026
Determinants of image quality in respiratory triggered free breathing lung MRI at 0.55 T in adults.
Article in Radiology advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pre-Imaging Clinical Factors Associated With Cardiac MR Image Quality Using Large Language Model-Enabled Data Extraction.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mid-field MRI scans (0.55 T) have gained attention for pulmonary imaging because of reduced susceptibility artifact, but image quality remains variable across patient populations, limiting its clinical adoption. Purpose: To identify technical and clinical factors associated with poor image quality in 0.55 T lung MRI in adults with various pulmonary diseases. Materials and Methods: Adults with major pulmonary disease (eg, infection, pulmonary fibrosis, cancer) who were scheduled for chest CT or PET/CT at a single health care site were prospectively recruited from January to August 2023 to undergo same-day 0.55 T MRI scans. Exclusion criteria included inability to communicate in English, overlapping pulmonary diagnoses already represented, or declining consent. Respiratory-triggered T2-weighted BLADE and T1-weighted UTE sequences were acquired on a Siemens MAGNETOM Free.Max (0.55 T) scanner. Six radiologists independently graded overall image quality (1 = poor, 2 = fine, 3 = excellent). Respiratory metrics were quantified, including tidal depth, respiratory rate, and respiration length. Body mass index (BMI) and body surface area were calculated. One-way analysis of variance was used to test the association between these factors and image quality. Interreader agreement was assessed using Fleiss kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: Twenty-eight participants (mean age, 59 years ± 19; 17 women) were evaluated. Fibrotic interstitial lung disease was linked to degraded image quality. Deeper tidal depth ( Conclusion: This preliminary study suggests that BMI, pulmonary fibrosis, and deep/slow breathing patterns may be associated with degraded respiratory triggered 0.55 T lung MRI. If confirmed in larger, more diverse cohorts, these findings could help identify patients at risk for lower quality imaging and inform strategies to optimize image quality in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.