ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2026
Sex-specific anatomical challenges in TAVR: A closer look at bicuspid aortic valve stenosis.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This paper seeks to examine the findings of the recently published study by Gitto et al., titled "Clinical Outcomes in Women and Men with Raphe-Type Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement," and to conduct a further analysis of the potential influencing factors. Methods: A critical analysis was conducted on this published multicenter registry study, with a focus on the finding that female patients have a higher risk of valve migration after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). In-depth discussions were carried out from the perspectives of sex-related anatomical differences of the aorta and device selection. Results: The original study indicated that female patients have a higher risk of post-TAVR valve migration and a lower technical success rate. This analysis suggests that, in addition to the factors mentioned in the original study (e.g., more frequent use of self-expandable valves and intra-annular downsizing), female-specific anatomical characteristics-such as a more horizontal aortic angle, more significant vascular tortuosity, and smaller iliac artery diameter-may jointly affect device delivery, positioning, and release stability, thereby contributing to such outcome disparities. Furthermore, it is recommended that the original study data be further analyzed to evaluate the impact of different types of self-expandable valves (e.g., ACURATE neo2) on valve positioning. Conclusion: In patients with raphe-type bicuspid aortic valve stenosis, sex-related anatomical variations and device selection discrepancies are important factors affecting TAVR outcomes. Future research and technological development should fully take these factors into account to achieve more personalized treatment strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.