ArticleOrthopedic reviews2026
Emerging Trends and Research Frontiers in Sports Injury Prevention: A Bibliometric Analysis.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abstract. Introduction: Sports participation continues to rise globally, accompanied by a substantial burden of preventable injuries that affect physical health, mental well-being, and healthcare costs. While injury prevention has become a recognized public health priority, the global structure and evolution of research in this field have not been comprehensively characterized. Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Web of Science database to identify publications related to sports injury prevention. Articles indexed under the topic search terms "injury prevention" AND "sport" were included without restriction on document type. Bibliographic data were analyzed using VOSviewer to assess co-authorship networks, journal distribution, and collaboration patterns. Microsoft Excel was used to evaluate publication trends over time and geographic contributions. Results: A total of 10,070 publications published between 1965 and 2025 were identified, with 94.8% written in English. Over 40% of all publications were published within the last five years, demonstrating rapid growth in the field. The United States accounted for the highest proportion of publications (32.9%), followed by Australia, England, and Canada. The British Journal of Sports Medicine was the most prolific journal. Prominent author collaboration networks were observed, with a small number of researchers demonstrating disproportionately high connectivity. Conclusion: Research on sports injury prevention has expanded exponentially, driven largely by high-income countries and concentrated author networks. Despite this growth, disparities in global representation and challenges in translating research into widespread prevention programs persist. Future efforts should emphasize inclusive global collaboration and real-world implementation of injury prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.