ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Favorable coronary outcomes following IL-6 blockade with tocilizumab in IVIG-resistant kawasaki disease: a case series.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and coronary outcomes of tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)-resistant Kawasaki disease (KD), and to place these findings against the conflicting available evidence. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed four patients with IVIG-resistant KD who received TCZ as rescue therapy. Clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic data (coronary artery Z-scores) were collected before and after treatment. Results: All patients received a second dose of IVIG before TCZ administration, however, symptoms did not improve. Following TCZ administration (median 15.5 days from onset), all patients achieved normothermia within 24 hours, accompanied by rapid normalization of inflammatory markers. Notably, no new coronary artery lesions (CALs) were identified after treatment. Additionally, in the two patients with pre-existing CALs, complete resolution of coronary dilation was observed during follow-up. No drug-related adverse events occurred. Conclusion: In this series, late administration of TCZ during the subacute phase was associated with a rapid anti-inflammatory response and favorable coronary remodeling, including aneurysm regression. This outcome contrasts with previous reports of coronary dilation following earlier intervention. Critically, these observations lead us to propose a "phase-dependent efficacy" hypothesis: the timing of IL-6 blockade relative to disease stage may be a critical determinant of coronary outcomes. This hypothesis underscores the need to consider the disease phase when evaluating IL-6 blockade for refractory KD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.