Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41694301›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

Promises and challenges of AI-enabled methods for myocardial characterisation in cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

N McWilliams, M Varela, G Joy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

N McWilliamsCardiovascular Research Institute, Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, City St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
M VarelaCardiovascular Research Institute, Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, City St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
G JoyCardiovascular Research Institute, Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, City St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) tissue characterisation is central to the diagnosis and risk stratification of myocardial disease. However, for certain techniques tissue characterisation CMR is limited by reliance on contrast agents, sensitivity to motion, prolonged acquisition times, and time- and labour-intensive image reconstruction and analysis. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising approach to address these challenges by enhancing and accelerating multiple stages of the CMR workflow. Deep learning methods can automate LGE segmentation, improve motion correction and image reconstruction for parametric mapping, and enable contrast-free characterisation of scar by exploiting native CMR signals, including myocardial motion and native T1 mapping. AI has also accelerated emerging techniques such as cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting and diffusion tensor imaging. In addition, radiomics and deep learning-based feature extraction offer the potential to derive high-dimensional tissue phenotypes and risk markers beyond those identifiable by expert clinicians. Despite these advances, translation remains limited by access to large-scale, heterogeneous training data, alongside concerns over generalisability, fairness, and interpretability, as well as barriers to regulatory approval and clinical deployment. In this mini-review, we summarise recent developments in AI-enabled myocardial tissue characterisation using CMR, highlighting both the promises and challenges for clinical translation.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecardiac magnetic resonancediffusion tensor imagingradiomicstissue characterisation

Identifiers

PMID41694301
PMCPMC12901332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.