ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Promises and challenges of AI-enabled methods for myocardial characterisation in cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) tissue characterisation is central to the diagnosis and risk stratification of myocardial disease. However, for certain techniques tissue characterisation CMR is limited by reliance on contrast agents, sensitivity to motion, prolonged acquisition times, and time- and labour-intensive image reconstruction and analysis. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising approach to address these challenges by enhancing and accelerating multiple stages of the CMR workflow. Deep learning methods can automate LGE segmentation, improve motion correction and image reconstruction for parametric mapping, and enable contrast-free characterisation of scar by exploiting native CMR signals, including myocardial motion and native T1 mapping. AI has also accelerated emerging techniques such as cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting and diffusion tensor imaging. In addition, radiomics and deep learning-based feature extraction offer the potential to derive high-dimensional tissue phenotypes and risk markers beyond those identifiable by expert clinicians. Despite these advances, translation remains limited by access to large-scale, heterogeneous training data, alongside concerns over generalisability, fairness, and interpretability, as well as barriers to regulatory approval and clinical deployment. In this mini-review, we summarise recent developments in AI-enabled myocardial tissue characterisation using CMR, highlighting both the promises and challenges for clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.