ArticleF&S reports2026
Impact of estetrol and drospirenone combination therapy on alleviation of the pelvic pain of endometriosis: a randomized control trial.
Article in F&S reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Estetrol/drospirenone for combined oral contraception: a systematic review of efficacy, cycle control, and safety.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical and endocrine effects of pharmacological therapy in endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Medical Treatment for Endometriosis: One Size Does Not Fit All.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To study the impact of estetrol (E4), a novel native estrogen with selective tissue activity, on endometriosis-associated pelvic pain (EAPP) and global impressions of endometriosis pain. Design: Multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled study; 88 eligible Japanese participants with endometriosis were randomized to either the E4 15 mg/drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg group or the ethinyl estradiol (EE) 20 μg/DRSP 3 mg group. Participants received assigned treatment for 12 weeks. Subjects: Japanese patients aged ≥20 and <50 years diagnosed with endometriosis. Eligibility required an EAPP score ≥40 mm on the visual analogue scale (VAS). Intervention: Participants were randomized 1:1 to E4/DRSP or EE/DRSP groups. Main Outcome Measures: Change in EAPP intensity from baseline to week 12, assessed using a 100 mm VAS, and patient's global impression of improvement (PGI-I) and clinician's global impression of improvement (CGI-I) scores after 12 weeks. Results: Changes in the most severe EAPP from baseline to week 12 were similar between the groups. The VAS score over time profiles showed lower scores with E4/DRSP than with EE/DRSP during the nonmenstrual period. Responders were defined as participants achieving ≥70 mm reduction from the most severe VAS score at baseline on ≥80% of nonmenstrual period days. On Fisher's exact test comparing responders and nonresponders, significant differences in patient's and clinician's global impression of improvement scores were seen. Furthermore, E4/DRSP had significantly higher responder rates than EE/DRSP. Conclusion: The E4/DRSP combination therapy has the potential to improve the quality of life of patients with endometriosis, with greater amelioration of nonmenstrual EAPP than EE/DRSP. Trial registration: JPRN-jRCT2080225090.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.