ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026
Disability inclusion in health data systems and policy in Korea: time for action.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Persons with disabilities experience significant health inequities globally, driven in part by the lack of disability-disaggregated data in national health surveillance systems. In Korea, despite having a well-established administrative infrastructure-most notably the Korean National Disability Registration System-disability-inclusive health data remain limited. The National Health Information Database, which links administrative and health insurance data, offers a rare example of integrated data enabling individual-level analysis by disability status, type, and severity. However, the absence of a legal mandate and limited policy recognition of disability inclusion have hindered the widespread use of disability identifiers across key national health datasets. Korea's experience illustrates both the potential and the limitations of relying solely on administrative definitions, which often fail to reflect the broader spectrum of disability outlined in international frameworks such as the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. To advance equity in health systems, countries must integrate disability into population-based data using standardized, functional definitions. This commentary emphasizes the need for both technical integration and a conceptual shift in how disability is defined, measured, and operationalized in health data systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.