Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41694209›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2026

Mosquito-Borne Viruses of Clinical Significance.

Donath Damian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Donath DamianDepartment of Biochemistry, Mbeya College of Health and Allied Sciences University of Dar es Salaam Mbeya Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6038-766X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mosquito-borne viruses represent a significant public health concern globally, with rising incidence rates leading to increased morbidity and mortality. This review aims to synthesize current knowledge regarding mosquito-borne viruses, focusing on their geographic distribution, clinical impact, diagnostic challenges, treatment options, and existing research gaps. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library. Studies published from January 2000 to the present were included, focusing on peer-reviewed articles related to mosquito-borne viruses. Data extraction and synthesis followed a structured methodology, assessing both the quality of included studies and the themes relevant to mosquito-borne viruses. Results: The review revealed significant geographic expansion of mosquito-borne viruses, facilitated by climate change and urbanization, affecting regions previously considered low risk. Clinical manifestations varied widely, with vulnerable populations, such as children and the elderly, being at higher risk for severe outcomes. Diagnostic methods, while improving, faced limitations in sensitivity and specificity. Treatment primarily focused on symptomatic relief, with limited antiviral options currently available. Notable gaps in research were identified, particularly in the development of effective vaccines and rapid diagnostic tools. Conclusions: The findings underscore the urgent need for integrated public health strategies to combat mosquito-borne viruses. Enhancing surveillance systems, improving diagnostic capabilities, expanding treatment options, and fostering vaccine development are critical steps. Addressing the identified research gaps will help mitigate the impacts of mosquito-borne viruses on global health.

Indexed as

clinical impactdiagnostic challengesgeographic distributionmosquito‐borne virusesresearch gapstreatment options

Identifiers

PMID41694209
PMCPMC12894768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.