ArticleHealth science reports2026
Mosquito-Borne Viruses of Clinical Significance.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Surveillance of Invasive Mosquitoes at Points of Entry in Northeastern Italy.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Article
- Identification of Ligand-Responsive RNA G-Quadruplexes in the 3' UTRs of Dengue Virus Serotypes.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Mosquito-Borne Viruses of Clinical Significance.Health science reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mosquito-borne viruses represent a significant public health concern globally, with rising incidence rates leading to increased morbidity and mortality. This review aims to synthesize current knowledge regarding mosquito-borne viruses, focusing on their geographic distribution, clinical impact, diagnostic challenges, treatment options, and existing research gaps. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library. Studies published from January 2000 to the present were included, focusing on peer-reviewed articles related to mosquito-borne viruses. Data extraction and synthesis followed a structured methodology, assessing both the quality of included studies and the themes relevant to mosquito-borne viruses. Results: The review revealed significant geographic expansion of mosquito-borne viruses, facilitated by climate change and urbanization, affecting regions previously considered low risk. Clinical manifestations varied widely, with vulnerable populations, such as children and the elderly, being at higher risk for severe outcomes. Diagnostic methods, while improving, faced limitations in sensitivity and specificity. Treatment primarily focused on symptomatic relief, with limited antiviral options currently available. Notable gaps in research were identified, particularly in the development of effective vaccines and rapid diagnostic tools. Conclusions: The findings underscore the urgent need for integrated public health strategies to combat mosquito-borne viruses. Enhancing surveillance systems, improving diagnostic capabilities, expanding treatment options, and fostering vaccine development are critical steps. Addressing the identified research gaps will help mitigate the impacts of mosquito-borne viruses on global health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.