ReviewPrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2025
Preoperative differential diagnosis - uterine sarcoma or myoma?
Review in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Exploratory Preoperative Risk Stratification of Uterine Mesenchymal Tumors in Postmenopausal Women with Complementary Transcriptomic Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) is a rare, heterogeneous, and aggressive tumour, representing only 2-5% of all uterine neoplasms. It poses a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge due to symptom overlap with benign uterine conditions such as uterine fibroids. Risk factors of uLMS include advanced age, larger tumour size, submucosal localisation, prior malignancies, tamoxifen use, pelvic radiation, and higher body mass index. This review analyses 13 studies to better identify preoperative indicators of leiomyosarcoma and highlights the challenges in differentiating malignant tumours from benign fibroids. Early detection remains difficult because the clinical presentation often mimics more common benign conditions, leading to delays in diagnosis and treatment. Current diagnostic methods: clinical examination, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and histopathology, offer important clues such as tumour size, irregular margins, necrosis, and vascular patterns, but none offers definitive preoperative diagnosis. While advanced imaging techniques like dynamic MRI show promise in distinguishing uLMS from leiomyomas, these methods are not yet practical for routine use. Blood markers lack diagnostic reliability. Minimally invasive surgical procedures, such as laparoscopic power morcellation, carry risks of spreading occult malignancies and should only be performed in carefully selected patients. Therefore, comprehensive preoperative evaluations and improved diagnostic tools are critical to facilitate earlier detection and optimise treatment outcomes, particularly in high-risk populations. Increased awareness among healthcare providers and patients is essential for improving prognosis and reducing the incidence of late-stage presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.