ReviewAnnals of vascular diseases2026
Physician-Modified Endografts for Complex Aortic Aneurysms in Japan: Current Status, Clinical Outcomes, and Guideline Integration.
Review in Annals of vascular diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early single-centre experience with physician-modified and Najuta fenestrated endografts for aortic arch disease: technical considerations and bailout strategies.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Japan, the absence of commercially available fenestrated and/or branched endografts has necessitated widespread adoption of physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) for complex aortic aneurysms. This paper compares PMEG use in Western countries and Japan, summarizes multicenter outcome data, and highlights the gap between real-world practice and current Japanese aortic disease guidelines. Recent Japanese series report high technical success and acceptable mid-term outcomes, comparable to Western reports. While long-term durability remains uncertain, structured training, national registries, and standardized protocols are essential. Guideline acknowledgment of PMEGs could improve safety, consistency, and international alignment in complex endovascular therapy. Establishing structured training, national registries, and evidence-based policy recognition of PMEGs is essential to ensure safe and standardized practice in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.