ArticleCureus2026
Early, Supervised Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training for Internal Medicine Interns: A Quality Improvement Initiative.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly being integrated into inpatient internal medicine; however, early residency training remains inconsistent. Objective evaluations of structured early-intern POCUS curricula that assess both knowledge and technical competency are limited. This study aimed to address this shortcoming through a quality improvement initiative. Methods We conducted a six-month quality improvement initiative within an internal medicine residency program (July-December 2023). Twenty interns participated in an early, structured POCUS curriculum consisting of didactics, supervised bedside training, and longitudinal reinforcement. Knowledge was assessed using a 15-question multiple-choice examination administered pre- and post-intervention. Practical competency was evaluated post-intervention using a standardized 30-point skills rubric. Paired knowledge outcomes were compared using the exact McNemar's test. Results At baseline, 10% (2/20) of participants met the passing threshold on the knowledge examination. Post-intervention, 95% (19/20) achieved a passing score (p < 0.001). Notably, 90% (18/20) passed the composite practical skills assessment. While 87% demonstrated proficiency in landmark identification and 65% achieved adequate overall image acquisition, performance was lower in advanced applications, including inferior vena cava measurement (35%) and aortic valve visualization (45%). Conclusions An early, supervised POCUS curriculum was associated with significant improvements in intern knowledge and high rates of technical competency. Descriptive analysis identified predictable limitations in advanced cardiac and inferior vena cava assessments, which informed targeted curricular refinement. Further research is required to evaluate long-term retention and clinical impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.