Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41694131›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Real-world effectiveness and safety of xanomeline and trospium for treatment-resistant schizophrenia in a state hospital system.

Nina Vadiei, M Lynn Crismon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nina VadieiCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
M Lynn CrismonCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Xanomeline and trospium (XT) is a novel medication for schizophrenia that was approved by the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in September 2024. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of using XT in the Texas state hospital setting. Methods: Data were analyzed retrospectively from five hospitals within the Texas Health and Human Services Commission state hospital system. Adults aged ≥ 18 years administered XT between October 2024 and October 2025 were included. A chart extracted Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Severity of Illness/Improvement was used to determine XT effectiveness. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics and documented adverse effects are reported. Results: All patients (N = 20) had treatment-resistant schizophrenia and were classified as markedly or severely ill prior to XT initiation. All patients except one were prescribed ≥ 1 dopamine receptor blocking agents (DRBA)s while taking XT, with olanzapine (n=9; 45%) and clozapine (n=6; 30%) being most common. Fourteen patients (70%) discontinued XT during the study time frame due to intolerability (n=9; 45%) and/or lack of effectiveness (n=12; 60%). The average global improvement CGI score was 4 (no change). Gastrointestinal side-effects were most common, specifically, vomiting (n=9; 45%), dyspepsia (n=5; 25%), and sialorrhea (n=5; 25%). Conclusion: In inpatients with TRS taking adjunct DRBAs (including anticholinergic DRBAs) XT use was commonly discontinued due to intolerability/ineffectiveness. Larger controlled trials are needed to further investigate XT's effectiveness for treating TRS and determine how adjunct anticholinergic use impacts its safety/efficacy.

Indexed as

effectivesafetyschizophreniatreatment-resistantxanomeline and trospium

Identifiers

PMID41694131
PMCPMC12904147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.