ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Addressing the challenges of intellectual disability identification for health policy and research in Australia.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article discusses the important issue of the need for a stable definition of intellectual disability in order to allow comparisons by place and over time such as in the monitoring of this population's health needs and utilization. The aim of the new Australian National Centre for Intellectual Disability Health, established in 2023, is to ensure that all Australian children and adults with intellectual disability receive high-quality healthcare that meets their needs. Monitoring changes in this regard requires accurate identification of the number of people with intellectual disability within a population which itself is inherently dependent on how intellectual disability is defined. We have used a definition which is relatively easy to operationalize through different sources i.e. a full-scale IQ of less than 70, a condition known to be consistent with intellectual disability or documentation of intellectual disability in medical records; through education a level of intellectual disability defined as either mild/moderate or greater, and through the National Disability Insurance Scheme an International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10-CM) diagnostic code associated with intellectual disability. In contrast the definition required by Inclusion Australia "a lifelong condition that affects a person's intellectual skills and their behavior in different situations" is much more difficult to operationalize. We discuss this challenge within the context of historical changes and the range of sources possibly able to provide this information today. We present two case studies from different Australian states and conclude with some suggestions for a multi-source approach using data linkage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.