ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Efficacy effects of fecal microbiota transplantation on depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From association to causality: mechanistic pathways linking the gut microbiome to psychiatric disorders.Translational psychiatry · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota contributions to anorexia nervosa pathogenesis: insights from the activity-based anorexia model.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Article
- Next-generation microbiome therapeutics: psychobiotics and fecal microbiota transplants for mental health treatment.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Clinical application of fecal microbiota transplantation and its influencing factors.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in the bidirectional communication between the gut and the brain. Although there has been much discussion in recent years on the link between depression and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), its effectiveness in treating depression remains debatable. The purpose of this study was to examine if FMT alleviates depression or its symptoms and to examine the possible impacts of various demographic subgroups and supplementation techniques. Methods: A systematic search of articles in the database (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane libraries) before March 2025. The Revman 5.3 software was used to incorporate standardized mean difference (SMD) and assess quality of evidence using recommended grading assessment, development and evaluation tools to investigate whether FMT efficacy on depressive symptoms or depression. Results: This meta-analysis included seven studies involving 235 subjects, and the results did not support a significant treatment effect of FMT on depression [SMD: -0.10; 95%CI: (-0.60,0.41); p = 0.71]. Subgroup analysis showed the correlation between the intervention effect of FMT and confirmed depression at baseline, intervention dose, donor source, repeated route of drug administration, and dietary habits of subjects. Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to support a significant efficacy of FMT on depressive symptoms, but subgroup analyses suggest that FMT may have a better antidepressant effect in the population with confirmed depression, and therefore more randomized controlled trials are necessary to validate the association between FMT and depressive symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.