Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41694069›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2026

Fidelity of intervention delivery in psychosocial and behavioral programs (FIPP): A modified Delphi study and final guideline.

Mackenzie Martin, Mason Moser, Alicia C Bunger, E B Caron, Mary Dozier, Jamie Lachman, Joanne Nicholson, Marija Raleva, Rachel C Shelton, Yulia Shenderovich and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mackenzie MartinDepartment of Early Learning and Curriculum Studies, Faculty of Health and Community Studies, MacEwan University, Edmonton , Canada.
Mason MoserCollege of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Alicia C BungerCollege of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
E B CaronDepartment of Psychology, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT, USA.
Mary DozierDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Jamie LachmanDepartment of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.
Joanne NicholsonInstitute for Behavioral Health, The Heller School, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.
Marija RalevaInstitute for Marriage, Family and Systemic Practice - ALTERNATIVA, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Rachel C SheltonDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Yulia ShenderovichWolfson Centre for Young People's Mental Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Kirsty SprangeNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Elaine ToomeySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, County Galway, Ireland.
Susan M BreitensteinCollege of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3081-5038

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Fidelity - ensuring interventions are implemented as intended - is a key focus in implementation science. Despite its benefits in research and practice, data on the fidelity of implementation are often overlooked, measured inconsistently, or underreported. In 2024, we proposed a preliminary guideline for one component of fidelity - the fidelity of delivery in parenting interventions. This study builds upon that work, refining the guideline for psychosocial and behavioral interventions. Methods: Using a modified Delphi technique, we refined the Fidelity of Intervention delivery in Psychosocial and behavioral Programs (FIPP) guideline. The process included survey responses ( Results: The modified Delphi technique resulted in a final FIPP with 35 items across six categories: intervention, facilitator, fidelity measure, and fidelity assessor characteristics; fidelity assessment method; and fidelity results and discussion. The final FIPP was produced based on engagement and data from the survey participants, consensus meeting panelists, and email panelists. Conclusions: This study advances reporting on fidelity of delivery in psychosocial and behavioral interventions by refining the FIPP guideline through a rigorous, consensus-driven process. The FIPP provides a comprehensive structure to improve the consistency and transparency of fidelity of delivery assessment. By promoting standardized reporting, the FIPP enhances the quality of implementation science, ultimately supporting more effective interventions and better participant outcomes. Researchers and practitioners are encouraged to adopt the FIPP to strengthen intervention fidelity and drive meaningful progress in the field.

Indexed as

fidelityImplementationinterventionsreporting guidelines

Identifiers

PMID41694069
PMCPMC12895452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.