ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2026
A systems framework for improving clinical trial recruitment: A literature-informed approach.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Recruitment and retention of populations with limited prior participation in clinical trials remains a challenge. Thus, an increased understanding of the complex factors that impede or facilitate recruitment and retention is needed. Adapting the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS), we developed the Systems Engineering Initiative for Participant-Centric Research (SEIPR) framework that researchers can use to develop, implement, and evaluate interventions to increase trial participation. Methods: We performed a non-systematic literature review using the digital databases PubMed and Google Scholar to determine factors facilitating and impeding involvement of populations with limited prior participation in clinical trials. From this literature, we developed the SEIPR framework by applying it to the context of recruitment and retention. Results: We organized key obstacles and evidence-based solutions into five framework components: Person, Tasks and Tools, Technology, Physical Environment, and Organizational Conditions. Common obstacles included lack of awareness of active trials by participants and healthcare providers, patient's distance from trial centers, lack of access to traditional advertising technology, and mistrust towards investigators, among others. Solutions included promotional strategies appropriate to the regional or social context, decentralizing trials, providing communication technology to participants, partnering with trusted members from the participant's community and primary care team, using local connections and community centers, financial incentives, and transportation solutions. Discussion: The SEIPR framework presents a promising tool for investigators interested in increasing participant breadth in clinical trials. Future research is needed to explore real-world applications and assess its effectiveness in recruiting and retaining broad populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.