ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Reconsidering the role of L2 self-motivational and affective factors in AI-mediated informal digital learning of English: a mixed-methods study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- L2 Selves, Control-Value Appraisals, and Engagement in AI-Supported Informal Digital Learning of English: An SEM and fsQCA Approach.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Growing scholarly interest has emphasized the significance of non-cognitive variables in influencing learners' informal English acquisition through artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced digital platforms. Despite this, research remains sparse on how motivational constructs, emotional responses, particularly enjoyment, and anxiety resulting from AI-assisted learning (AAL), and participation in AI-mediated informal digital English learning (AI-IDLE) collectively contribute to learners' self-efficacy beliefs in speaking English as a foreign language (EFL). Methods: Employing an explanatory sequential mixed-method design, this study surveyed 308 EFL secondary students in China, followed by in-depth interviews with eight voluntary respondents. Quantitative data were analyzed using structural equation modeling, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis involving both open and axial coding procedures. Results: Path results demonstrated that AAL negatively predicted EFL learners' AI-IDLE engagement. However, AI-IDLE exerted no statistically significant influence on students' self-reported self-efficacy in spoken English. Notably, enjoyment emerged as a mediator in the paths from the ideal second language (L2) self to both AI-IDLE and self-efficacy beliefs in speaking capacity. Qualitative data based on narrative descriptions evinced the heterogeneity of motivational and emotional factors of students operating in AI-supported informal learning situations. Discussion: Through a combination of quantitative results with interpretative reflections, this study presents some useful guidelines for maximizing student participation with respect to AI-IDLE, ensuring AI literacy, and protecting their emotional wellbeing through the rapidly developing environment of generative AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.