Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41694015›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Reconsidering the role of L2 self-motivational and affective factors in AI-mediated informal digital learning of English: a mixed-methods study.

Haomin Tommy Li, Ping Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haomin Tommy LiFaculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, City University of Macau, Macao, Macao SAR, China.
Ping YanSchool of Foreign Languages, China West Normal University, Nanchong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Growing scholarly interest has emphasized the significance of non-cognitive variables in influencing learners' informal English acquisition through artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced digital platforms. Despite this, research remains sparse on how motivational constructs, emotional responses, particularly enjoyment, and anxiety resulting from AI-assisted learning (AAL), and participation in AI-mediated informal digital English learning (AI-IDLE) collectively contribute to learners' self-efficacy beliefs in speaking English as a foreign language (EFL). Methods: Employing an explanatory sequential mixed-method design, this study surveyed 308 EFL secondary students in China, followed by in-depth interviews with eight voluntary respondents. Quantitative data were analyzed using structural equation modeling, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis involving both open and axial coding procedures. Results: Path results demonstrated that AAL negatively predicted EFL learners' AI-IDLE engagement. However, AI-IDLE exerted no statistically significant influence on students' self-reported self-efficacy in spoken English. Notably, enjoyment emerged as a mediator in the paths from the ideal second language (L2) self to both AI-IDLE and self-efficacy beliefs in speaking capacity. Qualitative data based on narrative descriptions evinced the heterogeneity of motivational and emotional factors of students operating in AI-supported informal learning situations. Discussion: Through a combination of quantitative results with interpretative reflections, this study presents some useful guidelines for maximizing student participation with respect to AI-IDLE, ensuring AI literacy, and protecting their emotional wellbeing through the rapidly developing environment of generative AI.

Indexed as

anxietyartificial intelligence-mediated informal digital learning of Englishenjoymentmotivationpositive psychologyself-efficacy beliefs

Identifiers

PMID41694015
PMCPMC12894280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.