ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
A two-step structural equation modeling and explainable machine learning framework for understanding university students' adoption of generative AI: balancing intrinsic motivations and perceived risks.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unpacking the dual-path trust mechanism driving students' continuance intention toward campus GenAI: a hybrid SEM-machine learning approach within the S-O-R framework.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- When crisis awareness weakens rational evaluation: the conditional role of information quality in college English teachers' adoption of generative AI.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The adoption of generative AI tools by university students has surged, embodying a mix of promising benefits and serious concerns. Understanding the factors that drive or hinder students' adoption of GenAI is essential for responsible integration of AI technologies in higher education. This study introduces a novel two step SEM-XML framework that couples structural equation modeling (SEM) with an explainable machine learning (XML) component, overcoming limitations of traditional SEM and enabling both hypothesis-driven path analysis and data-driven factor identification. Grounded in an integrated benefit-risk perspective, this framework blends constructs from the Technology Acceptance Model, Theory of Planned Behavior, Perceived Risk, and Knowledge Attitude Practice models, emphasizing students' intrinsic motivations. The study is designed as a cross-sectional survey, with an effective sample size of 880 respondents from southwestern China, including undergraduate, master's, and doctoral students. The average age of participants is 20.8 years, with a gender distribution of 48.52% male and a diverse academic background, encompassing fields such as Engineering, Economics, Science, and Management. We test this framework using a survey of university students' GenAI usage. Results show that positive perceptions such as perceived usefulness and personal interest strongly encourage GenAI use. In contrast, perceived risks related to ethics, accuracy, and academic integrity significantly inhibit it. This pattern is partially consistent with previous findings on ChatGPT adoption. These findings highlight how internal attitudes and external pressures interact to shape GenAI uptake. This study emphasizes the substantial impact of both internal and external factors on students' acceptance of GenAI tools, providing valuable insights for educational institutions, policymakers, and tool developers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.